German scientists have uncovered startling evidence that a substantial portion of the batches of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine deployed in the European Union may in fact have consisted of placebos – and hence were not even subjected to quality-control testing by the German regulatory agency which was in principle responsible for approving their release.
That was likely the case all around the world as well. Everyone that took the jab was basically part of a giant experiment, like human lab rats. Hell isn’t hot enough for these pharma demons.
It may not have been an experiment. I would love to know where the different batches went. Were the bad batches sent to target certain populations? Did the placebo go to the evil people who orchestrated this?
I got first and second jabs at a city-sponsored event for senior citizens. The batches I received were the second-worst and fourth-worst that were given in my city.
Yes, you may be right there. If you look at the number of ordinary citizens who got jabbed to death as well as those vax injured vs the politicians, business heads, bankers and all those in high ranking places, you'd think there'd be many more deaths among them so I'm guessing they took a special batch or a placebo.
Jun 29, 2023·edited Jun 29, 2023Liked by Robert Kogon
Back in 2008 they admitted that the governmental employees received a less risky vaccine against "swine flu". Back then, many doctors hesitated to give this jab and it had been retracted, after some cases of narcolepsia. Why shouldn't they have done the same? They knew about the number of severe AEs already in December 2020, nonetheless Health minister Lauterbach who is in commanding position to the PEI, injected even children in front of camera! The chief of the PEI had been in contact with CEO Of BioNTech already back in January 2020! Nonetheless in april 2020 he appears to have no idea, of the jab's technology.
update: To say it's evident the yellow had been placebo is overstated and might be lead to wrong conclusions. Please look for Geoff Pain's findings. Denmark is a small country, and we don't know the number of products of each batch and where they went, nor if the ingredients could have been homogenously the same from dose to dose! (which I doubt). Keep in mind, that the PEI only did a visual control and some few more things to evaluate. And the vials they look at, are chosen by the manufacturers! so it would be same to check a restaurant and get a pizza by delivery and aprove the restaurant.
Can you point me to some evidence that in 2008 government employees received a less risky vaccine against "swine flu'? I've not read anything like that before. As I posted just now, the actual article only says certain batches had way more adverse effects. There is nothing in there that says the "hot" batches were tested more and the "safe" batches tested less. There is nothing in there that says the "hot" batches were distributed less. Those much more serious allegations are not in the scientific article. So this makes me suspicious of the reporting on this story.
you can use deepL for translation. The statistics of the batches had been provided by the chemists that are trying to get more information from BioNTech and Paul Ehrlich Institut. As they are still in universities and known by name and the Journal Berliner Zeitung had published about the questions and the different batches, I don't think, that they invented this. I understand your doubts. Too much BS is being spread.
The way to know is to make them take random vials choosen from a 'public' vax site... thus much much more chance NOT saline. See how fast they flee and won't take that particular 'safe and effective' vial of jab juice
More than likely. But again, it comes down to the people - they need to wake up and realize that there's more going on, and that they should never trust those in authority like sheeple. After all, it is because of gullible people that the rest of us suffer because we can't bring these criminals to justice without every one of us going after them. It's always only the few who will not just go along with anything that is fed to them.
Fauci publicly stated he took the Moderna shot. Considering his financial investment in Moderna, I believe the purpose was to sell the Moderna shot. I doubt he took ANY covid shots.
I like that somebody hot boxed Cabin Newsome, sent him back to Hollywierd for some fat adrenachrome jabs. He had to leave Mordor unguarded 'cuz that paranoid tyrant didn't trust anyone in his stead...
I remember when Billy Gates, Tony Fauxci, and Resident Biden all got their jabs on live TV. I feel sorry for the poor bastards that watched them get saline and then proceeded to run out and get the real thing.
Bill, this story is not news! Craig Paardekooper, who created the website howbadismybatch.com, has amassed and presented online all of this information and much, much more. He's been at it for years now. I think he began this magnum opus immediately - or almost immediately - after the roll-out of the covid "vaccines," which in the United States was around December 15, 2020. The data were alarming from the very beginning. You owe it to yourself to carefully study his website. It'll blow your mind.
Credit where credit is due (howbadismybatch it's a great resource), but I've only seen this color grouping graph in the last few months, and the testing info chart seems to be a new twist. Hat tip to the scientists for their work!
Just to be clear, since this appears to be coming up, they do know howbadismybatch and Craig Paardekooper's work and they DO give credit. They even previously asked BioNTech to address Paardekooper's findings. According to Dyker, BioNTech responded and the company's answer was essentially: nah, never heard of it, all the batches are the same!
Yes. What's signific here is the revelation that placebo batches were passed over by those responsible for "quality control" indicating they knew it was unnecessary to review them.
Exactly. That's the only piece of new information in the article! And it's being covered up by all the "shock & awe" attacks & debunkings of the Danish study. The Danish study was published two months ago! And it had already been widely cited on Twitter, etc. Why weren't the would-be critics up in arms about it before? This looks like a campaign to hide the actual revelation in the article - which, of course, is not "my" revelation. It's the German chemists who made the discovery. All I did was to translate it into English. The Paul Ehrlich Institute did not do QC on precisely the apparently "harmless" batches. Trying to find a million different reasons to say they're not really harmless is not addressing the issue. Why didn't the PEI do QC on these batches? The "critics" are trying to let the PEI off the hook...
You have also seen how batches with similar levels of toxicity have batch codes that are part of the same mathematical or alpha-numeric sequence.
This show that batches with similar dosage concentrations were labelled in a similar way – so scientists could monitor the effects of different concentrations.
It appears that adverse effects are not random, but are rather the product of dosage testing within various toxic ranges, each denoted by a particular alphanumeric sequential code.
I cant find the reference just yet, but in the pfizer dump a few months ago, they had a chart on adverse events, one column was headed Toxicity and used 1, 2 or 3 . If I find it again I will forward it to you
I have been aware for a long time that it wasn’t possible that everyone was getting the same stuff.
1. Some people died the same day or within 48 hours yet others had absolutely no side effects. While people vary in their sensitivity to a given toxin, not by that much. There are complicated reasons why that is. But the profile of adverse effects wasn’t consistent with everyone getting the same stuff.
2. It wouldn’t have been possible to have produced batches with nearly identical properties. That’s a highly technical manufacturing process which alone requires several (4 ish) years to establish. Ergo, they weren’t reproducibly manufactured.
3. The batches could be characterised after manufacture, though. Then sent out & the results examined through VAERS. In this way, they’d establish what % injury & what % fatality rates flowed from what profile.
4. With that knowledge established, what we’d describe as dose-effect relationships in hand, they’d have “calibrated their killing weapons”, very useful for the eventual cycles I’ve long envisaged. These I believe will apply to the total digital control world of mandatory digital ID & cashless CBDC. They’ll require periodic “vaccination” eg per WHO “recommendations”. I’m afraid the only reason for doing any such thing is depopulation. There are no real vaccines & mRNA based injectables have only harm built into them.
I'm not sure there was such nefarious intent. Maybe. I think we need to see more about which batches were deployed where. That could reveal something even more nefarious: i.e. not a generalized depopulation agenda, but a targeted depopulation agenda.
But re. Germany & the PEI, we shouldn't overlook the strictly mercantile interest that Germany had in this "vaccine" and the fact that there was no arms-length relationship between the regulator, the PEI, and the firm, BioNTech, but rather a *symbiotic* one. This was a classic fox guarding the henhouse situation.
As you know, BioNTech was essentially *nothing* in the industry prior to Covid. But, as I've documented here - https://dailysceptic.org/2023/05/01/biontech-is-the-big-winner-from-the-vaccine-bonanza-not-pfizer/ - it would be far and away the biggest winner in the C19 "vaccine" goldrush, going literally from zero profits *ever* to $31 billion in profits in 2021 & 2021. I've calculated that BioNTech's earnings alone represented 10% of German growth in 2021.
But that doesn't take into account the multiplier effect of BioNTech's ill-begotten gains. If we included all the other German firms that collaborated in one way or another in producing the BioNTech "vaccine" - Siemens, Schott, Rentschler, Dermapharm, etc. - I wouldn't be surprised if we get closer to 50% of growth. The German economy became something like a "Corona economy" - at the same time, of course, as the rest of the European and global economy was suffering. And the German govt has every intention of ensuring that Germany remains a world leader in mRNA tech - which means, of course, that the dangerousness of the tech has to remain hidden.
Anyway, my 2 cents... Thanks again for the comments!
I hear you, and also Krevelli24. Rolling out vaccines that are unnecessary and dangerous for purely mercantile reasons is already nefarious enough. I’m just not convinced by the depopulation agenda. States seeking to consolidate or expand their power will not usually seek to reduce their own population. But they might seek to reduce the populations of other states they regard as rivals…
Btw, have you seen that the efforts to “debunk” this story are ongoing, now by suggesting that the Danish data is age-confounded? But look at this: https://twitter.com/mannichevibeke/status/1675484664981516289?s=61&t=OTzMZURTp__RinlbZSvyFQ It’s from one of the authors of the Danish study. The recipients of the “blue”, especially dangerous, batches were *younger*…
Well, I think one particular nation-state and one supra-state organization, which has essentially served as a vector of that state's interests, have played the key roles. Germany and the EU. Who gave the world the PCR protocol which, as you know, essentially created the "pandemic"? Germany in the person of Christian Drosten (and the Berlin-based Tib Molbiol, which was the first company to market the tests). Who financed the WHO's C19-response, the two essential components of which were the PCR tests and mass vaccination? Again, though this remains little known, overwhelmingly Germany. (See my article here - https://brownstone.org/articles/gates-or-germany-who-owns-the-whos-covid-19-response/ - in case you don't already know it.) Who gave the world the supposed "vaccine" that would serve as the go-to jab throughout the West. Again, Germany in the form of BioNTech. Every step of the way, Germany plays a pivotal, I would say *the* pivotal, role. Also, in promoting the idea of asymptomatic spread. That's why the role of the Paul Ehrlich Institute in connection with releasing the bad and apparently innocuous batches is so significant. And that's what's getting covered up by all the sound and fury of the supposed "debunkings" of the above story. They all focus on the Danish study and typically don't even mention the PEI and the fact that it didn't do QC on the yellow batches...
I’m a doctor and would claim that of course there is and was nefarious intent. Look at the industry’s track record. How would you go about losing weight today? Cut carbs, eat good fats, good protein, no seed oils, eat butter and not margarine, salt is good for you, etc. Exactly the polar opposite of what they said. Pumped us full of sugar and fake food while demonizing fat. They f*cked up peoples’ metabolisms for decades creating chronically ill people, by creating policies that they KNEW would create metabolic disasters. They created the obesity epidemic. And they did it decades ago, knowing full well what they were doing. No - this ALSO has nefarious intent. It wasn’t just an unlucky series of oopsies.
Mourn for a bit, that is Normal, then Rise Up. If you got the Shotz and have had "Complications" your opinion carries more weight amongst the "Jabbed"...
the rumour has circulated for a while already, I read that someone from pfizer stated they could not possibly make that many vials in so short a time so they filled them with saline solution. Lucky all those that got that instead of the poison.
This whole Plandemic thing was Planned for Years. They had the inventory. Only problem was some of it was not stored properly (Outside Temperature Parameters) reducing its intended impact.
‘There’s a lot to unpack in the short 21 minute video clip attached (by Dr David Martin) for those who are not well informed about the coronavirus studies leading back decades’.
MEP Cristian Terhes posted the whole European Parliament summit in two or three videos on YouTube a few months back, but as to be expected they are no longer available on YouTube.
thanks for the link ! of course youtube banned them. I am surprised some like Dr Martin's have been on there this long. I also like Sharyl Attkisson, she got a youtube from 8 years ago, where she demonstrates how you can lie by omission. Very good one.
Sharyl Attkisson sounds interesting and worth looking up. As Richard Vobes says in regards to politics etc, ‘it’s all theatre’!
Dr Martin was one of many who spoke in the ‘Third Covid summit at the European Parliament’. I think it would be groundbreaking if everyone at least heard what Dr David Martin said in those 21 minutes. It’s thanks to Richard Vobes (on YouTube/ Rumble) and Dr. John Campbell who first made me aware of the Covid Summit and Dr Martin.
I’ve started to get back into reading paperback books recently away from all the online noise, but I struggle to stick to one book at a time!
Many hint around the question on everybody's mind. Who got the safe jabs and who got the high adverse effects versions. I assume it was done by territory or were the safe vials sent directly to those who would be allowed to live (elites, governments, big pharma supporters, etc). I guess Elon Musk wasn't on that list as he had an adverse reaction. If the adverse effects were tracked by lot then surely the geographic location of the complainant would also be known.
A friend of mine from a small Eastern European country has a cousin who is in the highest office of their Justice Department. My friends cousin told him point blank, they got saline and they knew it. They broadcast it on TV but because the officials themselves didn’t want to take the shots, they were assured off air that the jabs THEY were getting was all saline.
This is a disgusting, though unsurprising nail in the coffin of the intent to harm that has been perpetrated on the human race. I hope they get their just rewards in this life or the next although I would prefer this one.
It's even more nefarious than that. Why are the highly toxic batches only given to so few people in Denmark? Apparently, unlike other batches, they were divided into much smaller lots which were distributed geographically *and temporally* throughout Europe.
Possible explanations as discussed in above mentioned German language interview with Prof. Dr. Gerald Dyker und Prof. Dr. Jörg Matysikas:
1. Health authorities noticed some batches were toxic, and vaccination with them was stopped. With a secret recall. Unlikely, see Point 3.
2. Special small batches were created, specifically to optimize the production processes. Also unlikely, see Point 3.
3. The highly toxic batches were split up and spread over multiple European countries. The interview partners state that they spoke with Danish colleagues who said that the toxic batches have showed up in multiple European countries, again and again at different time points (minute 12:45).
It seems that it was known these batches were toxic and the toxic effects were supposed to be hidden from the public. Were they testing something? Did they only want a certain portion of the population of a country affected by the toxic effects?
Where is that "above mentioned German language interviews" you wrote? Those may explain why the actual study only claims certain batches had way more adverse effects. There is nothing in the study saying certain batches were tested more than other batches, and that "hot" batches were distributed less than others.
In the interview, Professors Dyker and Matysikas say they spoke with the authors of the Danish study and the authors verbally stated what I mentioned above.
How much more will eventually get released? My guess is probably a lot more BS will come forth. Fauci lied, people died. And not only Fa8co but so did our elected officials, all liars!
That is the best question to ask. Who can I trust. I used to think I cold trust all my 'friends' but have been forced to redefine that term after this clowndemic.
I have one or two old friends, but dozens of new allies as friends/friends as allies.
Having a certain amount of placebo‘s included in with the harmful jabs, just goes to prove they’re evil, intentional actions in killing and severely injuring people with the jabs! By not killing or injuring everyone, they left “healthy” people who received them to support their misleading, false narrative. All those evil people involved, with the jabs need to face military tribunals, and the death penalty, based on their evil intent!
That was likely the case all around the world as well. Everyone that took the jab was basically part of a giant experiment, like human lab rats. Hell isn’t hot enough for these pharma demons.
I hope next level Hell awaits these demonic "people" or whatever they are. There isn't enough weed to escape this reality I find myself living in.
It may not have been an experiment. I would love to know where the different batches went. Were the bad batches sent to target certain populations? Did the placebo go to the evil people who orchestrated this?
I got first and second jabs at a city-sponsored event for senior citizens. The batches I received were the second-worst and fourth-worst that were given in my city.
Yes, you may be right there. If you look at the number of ordinary citizens who got jabbed to death as well as those vax injured vs the politicians, business heads, bankers and all those in high ranking places, you'd think there'd be many more deaths among them so I'm guessing they took a special batch or a placebo.
https://open.substack.com/pub/jessicar/p/debunking-the-yellow-dot-lot-placebo?r=ln7gi&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
Back in 2008 they admitted that the governmental employees received a less risky vaccine against "swine flu". Back then, many doctors hesitated to give this jab and it had been retracted, after some cases of narcolepsia. Why shouldn't they have done the same? They knew about the number of severe AEs already in December 2020, nonetheless Health minister Lauterbach who is in commanding position to the PEI, injected even children in front of camera! The chief of the PEI had been in contact with CEO Of BioNTech already back in January 2020! Nonetheless in april 2020 he appears to have no idea, of the jab's technology.
update: To say it's evident the yellow had been placebo is overstated and might be lead to wrong conclusions. Please look for Geoff Pain's findings. Denmark is a small country, and we don't know the number of products of each batch and where they went, nor if the ingredients could have been homogenously the same from dose to dose! (which I doubt). Keep in mind, that the PEI only did a visual control and some few more things to evaluate. And the vials they look at, are chosen by the manufacturers! so it would be same to check a restaurant and get a pizza by delivery and aprove the restaurant.
Can you point me to some evidence that in 2008 government employees received a less risky vaccine against "swine flu'? I've not read anything like that before. As I posted just now, the actual article only says certain batches had way more adverse effects. There is nothing in there that says the "hot" batches were tested more and the "safe" batches tested less. There is nothing in there that says the "hot" batches were distributed less. Those much more serious allegations are not in the scientific article. So this makes me suspicious of the reporting on this story.
https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/schweinegrippe-ts-184.html (this is public TV)
you can use deepL for translation. The statistics of the batches had been provided by the chemists that are trying to get more information from BioNTech and Paul Ehrlich Institut. As they are still in universities and known by name and the Journal Berliner Zeitung had published about the questions and the different batches, I don't think, that they invented this. I understand your doubts. Too much BS is being spread.
Placebos were used for elites and the rest of vaxxcrap was for public consumption.
I bet that Fauci got a placebo.
He sure didn't get the sacred miracle elixir. That much is certain.
The way to know is to make them take random vials choosen from a 'public' vax site... thus much much more chance NOT saline. See how fast they flee and won't take that particular 'safe and effective' vial of jab juice
More than likely. But again, it comes down to the people - they need to wake up and realize that there's more going on, and that they should never trust those in authority like sheeple. After all, it is because of gullible people that the rest of us suffer because we can't bring these criminals to justice without every one of us going after them. It's always only the few who will not just go along with anything that is fed to them.
Fauci publicly stated he took the Moderna shot. Considering his financial investment in Moderna, I believe the purpose was to sell the Moderna shot. I doubt he took ANY covid shots.
I like that somebody hot boxed Cabin Newsome, sent him back to Hollywierd for some fat adrenachrome jabs. He had to leave Mordor unguarded 'cuz that paranoid tyrant didn't trust anyone in his stead...
Yes,some Covid "Vaxxed" received Saline water, others got a higher % dose, with almost immediate reactions.
I remember when Billy Gates, Tony Fauxci, and Resident Biden all got their jabs on live TV. I feel sorry for the poor bastards that watched them get saline and then proceeded to run out and get the real thing.
My thoughts exactly.
If this story is true, it's huge. Or should be. Just think of all the implications and inferences.
Bill, this story is not news! Craig Paardekooper, who created the website howbadismybatch.com, has amassed and presented online all of this information and much, much more. He's been at it for years now. I think he began this magnum opus immediately - or almost immediately - after the roll-out of the covid "vaccines," which in the United States was around December 15, 2020. The data were alarming from the very beginning. You owe it to yourself to carefully study his website. It'll blow your mind.
Credit where credit is due (howbadismybatch it's a great resource), but I've only seen this color grouping graph in the last few months, and the testing info chart seems to be a new twist. Hat tip to the scientists for their work!
Just to be clear, since this appears to be coming up, they do know howbadismybatch and Craig Paardekooper's work and they DO give credit. They even previously asked BioNTech to address Paardekooper's findings. According to Dyker, BioNTech responded and the company's answer was essentially: nah, never heard of it, all the batches are the same!
Yes. What's signific here is the revelation that placebo batches were passed over by those responsible for "quality control" indicating they knew it was unnecessary to review them.
Exactly. That's the only piece of new information in the article! And it's being covered up by all the "shock & awe" attacks & debunkings of the Danish study. The Danish study was published two months ago! And it had already been widely cited on Twitter, etc. Why weren't the would-be critics up in arms about it before? This looks like a campaign to hide the actual revelation in the article - which, of course, is not "my" revelation. It's the German chemists who made the discovery. All I did was to translate it into English. The Paul Ehrlich Institute did not do QC on precisely the apparently "harmless" batches. Trying to find a million different reasons to say they're not really harmless is not addressing the issue. Why didn't the PEI do QC on these batches? The "critics" are trying to let the PEI off the hook...
Can I forward you a file showing toxicity? Pfizer one.
https://data-matter.tvwfc.co.uk/videochannel/pv/craigpaardekooper/v-4310_29112021/ Craig has done some good work on this subject Variations in Toxicity
Batches Labelled According to Toxicity
You have also seen how batches with similar levels of toxicity have batch codes that are part of the same mathematical or alpha-numeric sequence.
This show that batches with similar dosage concentrations were labelled in a similar way – so scientists could monitor the effects of different concentrations.
It appears that adverse effects are not random, but are rather the product of dosage testing within various toxic ranges, each denoted by a particular alphanumeric sequential code.
I cant find the reference just yet, but in the pfizer dump a few months ago, they had a chart on adverse events, one column was headed Toxicity and used 1, 2 or 3 . If I find it again I will forward it to you
https://phmpt.org/pfizer-16-plus-documents/
125742_S1_M5_5351_c4591001-interim-mth6-adverse-events.zip (pdf)
page 77 -3639 near the end toxicity 4 was added. Seems unusual for a report of adverse events to include such a term
In the 21st century wars are fought in the mind using mass hypnosis and nanotechnology. Brains are the battlefield, and the spoils of war.
More here; https://wakeuppeople.substack.com/p/the-first-world-mind-war
Absolutely.
I have been aware for a long time that it wasn’t possible that everyone was getting the same stuff.
1. Some people died the same day or within 48 hours yet others had absolutely no side effects. While people vary in their sensitivity to a given toxin, not by that much. There are complicated reasons why that is. But the profile of adverse effects wasn’t consistent with everyone getting the same stuff.
2. It wouldn’t have been possible to have produced batches with nearly identical properties. That’s a highly technical manufacturing process which alone requires several (4 ish) years to establish. Ergo, they weren’t reproducibly manufactured.
3. The batches could be characterised after manufacture, though. Then sent out & the results examined through VAERS. In this way, they’d establish what % injury & what % fatality rates flowed from what profile.
4. With that knowledge established, what we’d describe as dose-effect relationships in hand, they’d have “calibrated their killing weapons”, very useful for the eventual cycles I’ve long envisaged. These I believe will apply to the total digital control world of mandatory digital ID & cashless CBDC. They’ll require periodic “vaccination” eg per WHO “recommendations”. I’m afraid the only reason for doing any such thing is depopulation. There are no real vaccines & mRNA based injectables have only harm built into them.
I don’t see I can be more plain.
Best wishes,
Mike
Many thanks for your comments and insight!
I'm not sure there was such nefarious intent. Maybe. I think we need to see more about which batches were deployed where. That could reveal something even more nefarious: i.e. not a generalized depopulation agenda, but a targeted depopulation agenda.
But re. Germany & the PEI, we shouldn't overlook the strictly mercantile interest that Germany had in this "vaccine" and the fact that there was no arms-length relationship between the regulator, the PEI, and the firm, BioNTech, but rather a *symbiotic* one. This was a classic fox guarding the henhouse situation.
As you know, BioNTech was essentially *nothing* in the industry prior to Covid. But, as I've documented here - https://dailysceptic.org/2023/05/01/biontech-is-the-big-winner-from-the-vaccine-bonanza-not-pfizer/ - it would be far and away the biggest winner in the C19 "vaccine" goldrush, going literally from zero profits *ever* to $31 billion in profits in 2021 & 2021. I've calculated that BioNTech's earnings alone represented 10% of German growth in 2021.
But that doesn't take into account the multiplier effect of BioNTech's ill-begotten gains. If we included all the other German firms that collaborated in one way or another in producing the BioNTech "vaccine" - Siemens, Schott, Rentschler, Dermapharm, etc. - I wouldn't be surprised if we get closer to 50% of growth. The German economy became something like a "Corona economy" - at the same time, of course, as the rest of the European and global economy was suffering. And the German govt has every intention of ensuring that Germany remains a world leader in mRNA tech - which means, of course, that the dangerousness of the tech has to remain hidden.
Anyway, my 2 cents... Thanks again for the comments!
RK
As there was no pandemic, producing let alone rolling out “vaccines” ti almost everyone was superfluous.
These injections were overtly dangerous, too.
Best wishes
Mike
I hear you, and also Krevelli24. Rolling out vaccines that are unnecessary and dangerous for purely mercantile reasons is already nefarious enough. I’m just not convinced by the depopulation agenda. States seeking to consolidate or expand their power will not usually seek to reduce their own population. But they might seek to reduce the populations of other states they regard as rivals…
Btw, have you seen that the efforts to “debunk” this story are ongoing, now by suggesting that the Danish data is age-confounded? But look at this: https://twitter.com/mannichevibeke/status/1675484664981516289?s=61&t=OTzMZURTp__RinlbZSvyFQ It’s from one of the authors of the Danish study. The recipients of the “blue”, especially dangerous, batches were *younger*…
Agreed that historically states won’t wound themselves.
However, this global fraud is being run above the level of nation.
Well, I think one particular nation-state and one supra-state organization, which has essentially served as a vector of that state's interests, have played the key roles. Germany and the EU. Who gave the world the PCR protocol which, as you know, essentially created the "pandemic"? Germany in the person of Christian Drosten (and the Berlin-based Tib Molbiol, which was the first company to market the tests). Who financed the WHO's C19-response, the two essential components of which were the PCR tests and mass vaccination? Again, though this remains little known, overwhelmingly Germany. (See my article here - https://brownstone.org/articles/gates-or-germany-who-owns-the-whos-covid-19-response/ - in case you don't already know it.) Who gave the world the supposed "vaccine" that would serve as the go-to jab throughout the West. Again, Germany in the form of BioNTech. Every step of the way, Germany plays a pivotal, I would say *the* pivotal, role. Also, in promoting the idea of asymptomatic spread. That's why the role of the Paul Ehrlich Institute in connection with releasing the bad and apparently innocuous batches is so significant. And that's what's getting covered up by all the sound and fury of the supposed "debunkings" of the above story. They all focus on the Danish study and typically don't even mention the PEI and the fact that it didn't do QC on the yellow batches...
Thanks again for your comments...
I’m a doctor and would claim that of course there is and was nefarious intent. Look at the industry’s track record. How would you go about losing weight today? Cut carbs, eat good fats, good protein, no seed oils, eat butter and not margarine, salt is good for you, etc. Exactly the polar opposite of what they said. Pumped us full of sugar and fake food while demonizing fat. They f*cked up peoples’ metabolisms for decades creating chronically ill people, by creating policies that they KNEW would create metabolic disasters. They created the obesity epidemic. And they did it decades ago, knowing full well what they were doing. No - this ALSO has nefarious intent. It wasn’t just an unlucky series of oopsies.
Which countries got the bad batches !
Deagel.com …. 50% European depopulation by 2025
It’s all in Black & White
https://archive.is/eHOXw
Good luck to the perpetrators of these vaccines.
If they killed most of the Anglos, who will protect them?
This is the problem , the serfs aren’t needed anymore. within a few years drones and AI will be defending the borders
You are right. Sad for today's youth.
Please tell me this isn’t for real
There are many truths which people find unbelievable to be told.
I have been awakened to so many recently, so many that I have opened my mind to re-learning almost everything I have been taught to be true and fact?
I used to tell myself ‘nothing surprises me anymore’. That was back in 2017 and I have been eating those words ever since.
Yes, It Is Real...
We have been Lied to, Again...
Mourn for a bit, that is Normal, then Rise Up. If you got the Shotz and have had "Complications" your opinion carries more weight amongst the "Jabbed"...
Finally from pfizer - "safe and effective" placebo shots
Love it
the rumour has circulated for a while already, I read that someone from pfizer stated they could not possibly make that many vials in so short a time so they filled them with saline solution. Lucky all those that got that instead of the poison.
This whole Plandemic thing was Planned for Years. They had the inventory. Only problem was some of it was not stored properly (Outside Temperature Parameters) reducing its intended impact.
‘There’s a lot to unpack in the short 21 minute video clip attached (by Dr David Martin) for those who are not well informed about the coronavirus studies leading back decades’.
MEP Cristian Terhes posted the whole European Parliament summit in two or three videos on YouTube a few months back, but as to be expected they are no longer available on YouTube.
https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/1661698114917646336?s=20
thanks for the link ! of course youtube banned them. I am surprised some like Dr Martin's have been on there this long. I also like Sharyl Attkisson, she got a youtube from 8 years ago, where she demonstrates how you can lie by omission. Very good one.
I came across a short video (attached -Woke: A Culture War Against Europe | James Lindsay at the European Parliament)…
by James Lindsey on his ‘New Discourses’ YouTube platform, who in my opinion explains what ‘Woke’ is the disguise for…
What all the ‘Woke’ is leading to,…
which will effect us all!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OVZPYQS1dFA&t=1s&pp=2AEBkAIB&fbclid=IwAR1lj8cVv4fCWAfaSssCh7jB1APUKGlhn9SxNINQckA_8iIZ1tkpTXQL924_aem_ASxsUk74ik6dHOxQXWtpStUZAo-O0_33ArOs1ZAIhh5H8ZEKREwnFdyTgoZPYvC7ats
tried to watch. already "autoplay blocked" on youtube
Thanks,
Sharyl Attkisson sounds interesting and worth looking up. As Richard Vobes says in regards to politics etc, ‘it’s all theatre’!
Dr Martin was one of many who spoke in the ‘Third Covid summit at the European Parliament’. I think it would be groundbreaking if everyone at least heard what Dr David Martin said in those 21 minutes. It’s thanks to Richard Vobes (on YouTube/ Rumble) and Dr. John Campbell who first made me aware of the Covid Summit and Dr Martin.
I’ve started to get back into reading paperback books recently away from all the online noise, but I struggle to stick to one book at a time!
Many hint around the question on everybody's mind. Who got the safe jabs and who got the high adverse effects versions. I assume it was done by territory or were the safe vials sent directly to those who would be allowed to live (elites, governments, big pharma supporters, etc). I guess Elon Musk wasn't on that list as he had an adverse reaction. If the adverse effects were tracked by lot then surely the geographic location of the complainant would also be known.
A friend of mine from a small Eastern European country has a cousin who is in the highest office of their Justice Department. My friends cousin told him point blank, they got saline and they knew it. They broadcast it on TV but because the officials themselves didn’t want to take the shots, they were assured off air that the jabs THEY were getting was all saline.
Look at the politicians, heads of states and corporations, bankers, royalty.....not much death and vax injury amongst them, right?
This is a disgusting, though unsurprising nail in the coffin of the intent to harm that has been perpetrated on the human race. I hope they get their just rewards in this life or the next although I would prefer this one.
Nuremberg Trials 2.0 would be a nice start, yes?
A delicious appetizer, yes.
Amazing article. Thanks.
It's even more nefarious than that. Why are the highly toxic batches only given to so few people in Denmark? Apparently, unlike other batches, they were divided into much smaller lots which were distributed geographically *and temporally* throughout Europe.
Possible explanations as discussed in above mentioned German language interview with Prof. Dr. Gerald Dyker und Prof. Dr. Jörg Matysikas:
1. Health authorities noticed some batches were toxic, and vaccination with them was stopped. With a secret recall. Unlikely, see Point 3.
2. Special small batches were created, specifically to optimize the production processes. Also unlikely, see Point 3.
3. The highly toxic batches were split up and spread over multiple European countries. The interview partners state that they spoke with Danish colleagues who said that the toxic batches have showed up in multiple European countries, again and again at different time points (minute 12:45).
It seems that it was known these batches were toxic and the toxic effects were supposed to be hidden from the public. Were they testing something? Did they only want a certain portion of the population of a country affected by the toxic effects?
Yes, so that in the near future, they can run a controlled depopulation program.
Where is that "above mentioned German language interviews" you wrote? Those may explain why the actual study only claims certain batches had way more adverse effects. There is nothing in the study saying certain batches were tested more than other batches, and that "hot" batches were distributed less than others.
The link to the interview is in the Daily Sceptic piece referred to by Dr. Malone: https://dailysceptic.org/2023/06/28/pfizer-vaccine-batches-in-the-eu-were-placebos-say-scientists/
In the interview, Professors Dyker and Matysikas say they spoke with the authors of the Danish study and the authors verbally stated what I mentioned above.
How much more will eventually get released? My guess is probably a lot more BS will come forth. Fauci lied, people died. And not only Fa8co but so did our elected officials, all liars!
Wow... Wish I could sell placebos for full price.. So who can we trust in this world?
That is the best question to ask. Who can I trust. I used to think I cold trust all my 'friends' but have been forced to redefine that term after this clowndemic.
I have one or two old friends, but dozens of new allies as friends/friends as allies.
Having a certain amount of placebo‘s included in with the harmful jabs, just goes to prove they’re evil, intentional actions in killing and severely injuring people with the jabs! By not killing or injuring everyone, they left “healthy” people who received them to support their misleading, false narrative. All those evil people involved, with the jabs need to face military tribunals, and the death penalty, based on their evil intent!