Excellent. As you suggested in your Daily Skeptic article, someone should file a freedom of information request with the two German regulators to obtain all of the evidence of the studies for BioTech’s proposed cancer therapies that in all likelihood induced cancer. They did know or should have known before releasing these dangerous covid-19 countermeasures on the poorly-informed world.
FOIs unfortunately have too low a hit rate to be that useful. Granted, occasionally something juicy slips through, but governments are becoming expert in prevarication and obfuscation, with a sprinkling of falsification probably thrown in as well. The German government seems more adept than most in this.
I know for example that someone was trying to get the emails out of Charite in Berlin relating to Drosten's claimed development of his PCR test. Nothing has been forthcoming so far, even after some formal legal proceedings.
That doesn't mean people shouldn't try of course, because the avoidance tactics on diaplay tell a story in themselves. This can pique curiosity in some people, which might lead to them investigating further and beginning to understand the extent of the cover-up.
Well, there's FOI and FOI. Think of everything we have on the "Pfizer" trial - virtually the complete record - everything we have on DEFUSE, the Fauci-Farrar e-mails, even Kristian Andersen et al's Slack messages. (I'm not myself sure how the latter fell under the FOIA, I'd be curious to know more.) So, the US FOIA has been relatively effective and much of the international discussion on the Covid-response, etc. has been fueled by US FOI releases.
Germany is indeed another matter. Germany's FOIA only dates from 2005. Before that, German historians were, for instance, complaining about the lack of access to official documents and noting that the country was not up to international standards (at least in the West) on such matters. I'm quite sure it still isn't. The devil is in the details, as they say. So, when I say "test" the German FOI legislation, I mean precisely in order at least to expose the fact that German authorities are precisely NOT being forthcoming. This would be revealing in its own right.
The importance of the "RKI Files", btw, has been way overblown and has been misunderstood and misreported (as always). No court forced the RKI to release those documents. The RKI coughed them up of its own accord after redacting a ton. The release undoubtedly hides much more than it reveals.
Thank you. I was guessing that the process for making successful Freedom of information requests in Germany might be slower or more cumbersome than in the United States, but I agree with you that filing these requests might still be worthwhile because the reaction and stalling techniques might tell a story or might help to wake up some people.
Excellent. As you suggested in your Daily Skeptic article, someone should file a freedom of information request with the two German regulators to obtain all of the evidence of the studies for BioTech’s proposed cancer therapies that in all likelihood induced cancer. They did know or should have known before releasing these dangerous covid-19 countermeasures on the poorly-informed world.
FOIs unfortunately have too low a hit rate to be that useful. Granted, occasionally something juicy slips through, but governments are becoming expert in prevarication and obfuscation, with a sprinkling of falsification probably thrown in as well. The German government seems more adept than most in this.
I know for example that someone was trying to get the emails out of Charite in Berlin relating to Drosten's claimed development of his PCR test. Nothing has been forthcoming so far, even after some formal legal proceedings.
That doesn't mean people shouldn't try of course, because the avoidance tactics on diaplay tell a story in themselves. This can pique curiosity in some people, which might lead to them investigating further and beginning to understand the extent of the cover-up.
Well, there's FOI and FOI. Think of everything we have on the "Pfizer" trial - virtually the complete record - everything we have on DEFUSE, the Fauci-Farrar e-mails, even Kristian Andersen et al's Slack messages. (I'm not myself sure how the latter fell under the FOIA, I'd be curious to know more.) So, the US FOIA has been relatively effective and much of the international discussion on the Covid-response, etc. has been fueled by US FOI releases.
Germany is indeed another matter. Germany's FOIA only dates from 2005. Before that, German historians were, for instance, complaining about the lack of access to official documents and noting that the country was not up to international standards (at least in the West) on such matters. I'm quite sure it still isn't. The devil is in the details, as they say. So, when I say "test" the German FOI legislation, I mean precisely in order at least to expose the fact that German authorities are precisely NOT being forthcoming. This would be revealing in its own right.
The importance of the "RKI Files", btw, has been way overblown and has been misunderstood and misreported (as always). No court forced the RKI to release those documents. The RKI coughed them up of its own accord after redacting a ton. The release undoubtedly hides much more than it reveals.
Thank you. I was guessing that the process for making successful Freedom of information requests in Germany might be slower or more cumbersome than in the United States, but I agree with you that filing these requests might still be worthwhile because the reaction and stalling techniques might tell a story or might help to wake up some people.
Perez. (2024). Do Covid19 modified mRNA jabs Pose a Risk of Creating Harmful Proteins or Prions ?. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10533235
Merci!
Plandemonium "In the Crosshairs of Covid-19 Scientology Operation" - Reiner Fuellmich and an operation to silence a CoS-Critc https://nuremberg2.substack.com/p/plandemonium-in-the-crosshairs-of