The excellent commentator on pharmacological matters, @gutwat1, suggests in a tweet thread that the C19 vax should be regarded as an adulterated drug on account of quality issues, and she asks whether regulatory standards were lowered under WHO guidance. I understand her to mean, more precisely, the BioNTech-“Pfizer” vaccine, since it is, after all, the standard C19 jab in the West and she has written extensively on it.
Not to mention that Angela Merkel was one of the very first heads of government who self-quarantined early on during the "pandemic". Not to mention that in 2022 Germany was probably the "hardest-hit country" by the same "pandemic" that the BioNTech vaccine is supposed to fight against. Indeed, there's something about Germany and this virus. One just can get enough of the other.
Who “Owns” the WHO’s COVID-19 Response?
Not to mention that Angela Merkel was one of the very first heads of government who self-quarantined early on during the "pandemic". Not to mention that in 2022 Germany was probably the "hardest-hit country" by the same "pandemic" that the BioNTech vaccine is supposed to fight against. Indeed, there's something about Germany and this virus. One just can get enough of the other.
Wow, Canada is right up there too. #4 in the world. And we're right up there with the most authoritarian as well.
Thanks for this, I found it helpful.
I am not sure that pointing out the percentage of historic funds that were allocated to polio is all that relevant.
When I look here: https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiNzNmNTRkMWEtNmZjMS00NzdjLWEyMDYtYWExYzA4NzVhZGQwIiwidCI6ImY2MTBjMGI3LWJkMjQtNGIzOS04MTBiLTNkYzI4MGFmYjU5MCIsImMiOjh9 all funds appear to be tagged as being related to covid in 2020-2021. I can't make sense of that. Can you?