Like in the children’s game Chinese Whispers, in which a sentence whispered by one player into the ear of another can become something totally different by the time it has gone around the table, so it is on X, in which an initial report can become something significantly different, and usually far more sensational, in its viral form. And this is even more typically the case when the initial report originates in a foreign language. Thus it is that by the time these words are published many millions of X users will already ‘know’ that a law has been passed in France criminalising opposition to mRNA injections.
Such a strange law though. So if someone was prescribed as a dangerous drug such as a fluoroquinolone antibiotic and a concerned family member suggested that they stop taking it and get a prescription for something safer that concerned family member would be fined and jailed for potentially saving that person from severe side effects?
I fear your interpretation of this new law-to-be is too optimistic. It contains too many weasel words that can be used in selective prosecution, depending upon what constitutes “current” medical views, and so on.
”the French National Assembly clearly limits the application of the law to persons who are already ill or, per the language of the text, “suffering from a medical condition” (atteint d’une pathologie).
Hence, it is hard to see how any judge could interpret such provisions as applying to vaccines, whether mRNA-based or otherwise.”
Have you perhaps forgotten that we ”all” have been declared ”ill” from c19, thanks to adulterate and inappropriate PCR tests ⁉️⁉️
Hi Robert, I think you need to forget about the expose, and put a whole article up here, on substack. To branch out. And see what happens. Unless you have some contract.
Such a strange law though. So if someone was prescribed as a dangerous drug such as a fluoroquinolone antibiotic and a concerned family member suggested that they stop taking it and get a prescription for something safer that concerned family member would be fined and jailed for potentially saving that person from severe side effects?
https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/p/what-happens-in-france-stays-in-france
I fear your interpretation of this new law-to-be is too optimistic. It contains too many weasel words that can be used in selective prosecution, depending upon what constitutes “current” medical views, and so on.
”the French National Assembly clearly limits the application of the law to persons who are already ill or, per the language of the text, “suffering from a medical condition” (atteint d’une pathologie).
Hence, it is hard to see how any judge could interpret such provisions as applying to vaccines, whether mRNA-based or otherwise.”
Have you perhaps forgotten that we ”all” have been declared ”ill” from c19, thanks to adulterate and inappropriate PCR tests ⁉️⁉️
Hi Robert, I think you need to forget about the expose, and put a whole article up here, on substack. To branch out. And see what happens. Unless you have some contract.