Like in the children’s game Chinese Whispers, in which a sentence whispered by one player into the ear of another can become something totally different by the time it has gone around the table, so it is on X, in which an initial report can become something significantly different, and usually far more sensational, in its viral form.
Such a strange law though. So if someone was prescribed as a dangerous drug such as a fluoroquinolone antibiotic and a concerned family member suggested that they stop taking it and get a prescription for something safer that concerned family member would be fined and jailed for potentially saving that person from severe side effects?
I fear your interpretation of this new law-to-be is too optimistic. It contains too many weasel words that can be used in selective prosecution, depending upon what constitutes “current” medical views, and so on.
”the French National Assembly clearly limits the application of the law to persons who are already ill or, per the language of the text, “suffering from a medical condition” (atteint d’une pathologie).
Hence, it is hard to see how any judge could interpret such provisions as applying to vaccines, whether mRNA-based or otherwise.”
Have you perhaps forgotten that we ”all” have been declared ”ill” from c19, thanks to adulterate and inappropriate PCR tests ⁉️⁉️
Hi Robert, I think you need to forget about the expose, and put a whole article up here, on substack. To branch out. And see what happens. Unless you have some contract.
Meaning The Daily Sceptic? Why would I forget about the DS? But I will, I think, post more full pieces here. I did post one a few days ago. And if "CocotteMinute" doesn't like it, he or she can unsubscribe or I'll do it. How weird. I don't think I've ever encountered any trolling on Substack before.
Such a strange law though. So if someone was prescribed as a dangerous drug such as a fluoroquinolone antibiotic and a concerned family member suggested that they stop taking it and get a prescription for something safer that concerned family member would be fined and jailed for potentially saving that person from severe side effects?
https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/p/what-happens-in-france-stays-in-france
I fear your interpretation of this new law-to-be is too optimistic. It contains too many weasel words that can be used in selective prosecution, depending upon what constitutes “current” medical views, and so on.
”the French National Assembly clearly limits the application of the law to persons who are already ill or, per the language of the text, “suffering from a medical condition” (atteint d’une pathologie).
Hence, it is hard to see how any judge could interpret such provisions as applying to vaccines, whether mRNA-based or otherwise.”
Have you perhaps forgotten that we ”all” have been declared ”ill” from c19, thanks to adulterate and inappropriate PCR tests ⁉️⁉️
Hi Robert, I think you need to forget about the expose, and put a whole article up here, on substack. To branch out. And see what happens. Unless you have some contract.
Meaning The Daily Sceptic? Why would I forget about the DS? But I will, I think, post more full pieces here. I did post one a few days ago. And if "CocotteMinute" doesn't like it, he or she can unsubscribe or I'll do it. How weird. I don't think I've ever encountered any trolling on Substack before.
I didn't mean to forget the DS. But I am looking forward to reading your longer pieces here too.
:)
For God’sake, no, thanks. Honest people do not need more mental scrambling or useless adrenaline climbs.
Even and especially if he has a contract.