13 Comments

Hi Robert (aka ?) - I'm messaging you here because the email listed for you on Brownstone bounced my message back. My name is Debbie Lerman and I'm a fellow Brownstone contributor.

I love your recent articles on Brownstone about BioNTech and Drosten and believe they are important contributions to the ongoing investigation of what actually happened w the international Covid response.

I have a few thoughts I wanted to get your take on:

1) I believe, based on your revelations and my own research, that Drosten is part of the international biodefense (military/intelligence/national security) cabal that was involved in creating SARS-CoV-2 and then destroying the world while making billions of dollars in response to it. (I'm not a believer in the intentional release theory -- I think it was an accident, but the response was still the same). His involvement in the PCR testing scheme, in my opinion, was part of a planned international biodefense response to the virus intended to terrify the population.

Anyway, I don't think Drosten is just a government bureaucrat. Is his potential involvement with national security/intelligence something you're interested in investigating? My German is OK but not good enough to read lots of websites and documents quickly, so I need help! I'm also interested in finding names of other potential biodefense cabal members in Germany and connections between them and U.S./other allies/China.

2) I also don't believe anything BioNTech or Pfizer say about the BioNTech product, nor what Moderna says about its product. So I think it might be naive to believe what you state in your latest article:

"But this had nothing whatsoever to do with the US government’s Operation Warp Speed, as Latypova suggests. On Sahin and Türeci’s account, BioNTech launched its own project to develop a Covid-19 vaccine, dubbed “Project Lightspeed,” already in late January 2020 – less than a month after the first Covid-19 cases had been reported in Wuhan and before the outbreak had even been designated a pandemic by the WHO! This was, moreover, roughly five months before the US government would officially launch Operation Warp Speed in May."

There is NO WAY Moderna started working on its vaccine in May. Also, as you point out, records show that BioNTech started one day after the SARS-CoV-2 genome was released -- but I'm skeptical even of that timeline! I think Drosten/German intelligence and people like Daszak and Callahan representing US intelligence were involved in, or at least aware of, the gain of function creation of SARS-CoV-2 so they knew, or at least suspected it had been released, long before the WHO declared the pandemic. And they started developing their vaccines long before anyone else.

(as an aside, I also think Drosten created his PCR test based on a sequence he got from the WIV, not on some made up SARS fragment as he officially stated -- although I guess that doesn't really matter since the sensitivity was turned up so fraudulently high).

The implications are mind-boggling: I think the BioNTech and Moderna "vaccines" were pre-chosen by the biodefense cabal for "success" and ushered through all the regulatory hurdles (or lack thereof) by the cabal, while it pretended to also support other companies' efforts by giving them money. It sounds to me like BioNTech latched on to Pfizer probably with help from the US national security/intelligence network so that the BioNTech product could be treated as a "bioterrorism countermeasure" the same way the Moderna product was -- which, in the US, means there is no oversight and almost no regulatory requirements (as per Latypova's findings). I'm also guessing it would have been much harder to get the BioNTech vaccine through German regulatory channels.

Another very curious and never addressed issue is the fact that the only two vaccines that "succeeded" were mRNA products. I don't think anyone can argue that mRNA was a promising respiratory virus vaccine platform, since it had failed for decades in producing safe, let alone effective, vaccines. But it was favored by the US biodefense cabal, including Fauci and his cronies, because they thought it could be quickly adjusted to work for any virus and provide their dream of a "bug to drug in 24 hours" medical countermeasure platform.

What do you think?

3) IMO, the most intriguing bit of info in Latypova's article is the CHINESE connection

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/the-role-of-the-us-dod-and-their?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

Pfizer-BioNTech is really a 3-party R&D alliance: Fosun-Pfizer-BioNTech, and by “party” I mean that one of the three is the Chinese Communist Party. Fosun is a huge Chinese conglomerate that owns a large number of global companies, and its chairman Guo Guangchang is a very high ranking member of the CCP. It is curious that the US DoD awarded $10 billion (Pfizer’s Operation Warp Speed/DoD/BARDA contract) to a venture whose substantial equity (and IP) holder is the the Chinese Communist Party.

What's your take on that?

4) Any thoughts on Fuellmach and the Coronavirus Investigative Committee https://corona-investigative-committee.com/? Are they having any impact in Germany?

5) Any thoughts on/relation to eugyppius? He/she's the other source I have for good German pandemic info.

Thanks for letting me do this info/thought dump. There is so much to investigate and so few of us doing the work. I feel totally overwhelmed, so anyone in the trenches feels like a great friend!

Cheers,

Debbie

debbielerman@gmail.com

Expand full comment

The Pfizer - BioNTech relationship is likely a vital key in understanding the early decision-making re Comirnaty. Looking at the emerging information about the military/countermeasure aspect of vaccine development, and the pre-existing relationship between BARDA and Moderna, as well as the role of BARDA in the accelerated timetable of Operation Warp Speed, is suggestive. As you’ve previously pointed out, BNT was closely aligned with German government in its inception, and presumably within the German government one will find a parallel quasi-military arm of public health which also viewed Covid and vaccines using the lens of “countermeasure,” with all the haste (and corner-cutting?) that is implied.

Expand full comment
Jan 13, 2023·edited Jan 13, 2023

Thank you for setting the record straight on BioNTech's relationship with Pfizer at the outset of covid shot develepment/marketing. (Icannot bring myself to call it a "vaccine.")

I suspect the widespread confusion about which is the primary actor in this farce is deliberate, with BioNTech intentionally using Pfizer as a public shield.

P.S. Your use of the term "auto-hagiographical" in the Brownstone piece is perfect here. I would add, in a self-indulgent aside, that Tureci and Sahin are the perfect image of Bond villain evil scientists.

Expand full comment