In light of the years during which it was not only taboo to call into question the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, but indeed in many social media literally forbidden, perhaps the most astounding provision in the unredacted EU contract with the Pfizer-BioNTech consortium is the clause in the appended order form in which EU member states are required to acknowledge “that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known”.
But what makes the clause even more significant and revealing is that it is only in the Pfizer-BioNTech contract. It is not to be found in the EU contracts with Moderna and AstraZeneca, which have also been published in unredacted form.
And this is not the only instance of Pfizer-BioNTech receiving preferential treatment in the contract.
Why would the European Commission have favored Pfizer and BioNTech? It surely has much more to do with BioNTech than Pfizer…
For the details and a discussion, see my new article at The Daily Sceptic here.
this is the explanation! Germany was is in big need of a new business model and that is "Global Health" and "Pandemic preparedness" Here https://helendunkel.substack.com/p/germanys-biotech-branch-an-overview you can find an extensive list. And now ask yourself, dear Robert Kogon and dear readers why the heck people in the EU and anywhere is talking about US and China and Pfizer all the time? Why do they skip around Germany's role in this? It is definedly not some fringe role in the middle of Europe.
And the fact that Ursula VdL had a family connection to BioNTech had nothing to do with anything.