Controversial French ‘Pfizer Law’ is in Fact an ‘Anti-Raoult Law’
As shown in my previous article, the supposed French ‘Pfizer Law’, which social media got so excited about last week, makes no mention whatsoever of mRNA vaccines and could certainly not be used, under any reasonable interpretation of the text, to criminalise criticism of them. But this is not to say that it has nothing to do with the COVID-19 response and the criminalisation of medical dissent. It has everything to do with the latter. But the actual target of the law is not vaccine criticism, but rather the touting of alternative therapies, as personified by Didier Raoult, the specialist in infectious diseases from Marseille who famously promoted the off-label use of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19.
The law is, if anything, an ‘anti-Raoult law’.
For the details, see my new article at The Daily Sceptic here.
The wording of the law allows it to be interpreted in more than one way and to be used to discriminate as the government wishes. It is dangerous to citizen autonomy and freedom.
The French of Marseille have done an outstanding job in spite of all harassments!