Are the Leaked Robert Koch Institute Redactions Forgeries?
Apart from technical archival considerations, what was initially publicized as the biggest scoop in the leaked RKI files is a wild anachronism that practically screams out: "forgery!” We know from numerous public and concordant records that in mid-April 2020, the German government was mobilizing to support the Covid-19 vaccine project of none other than its longtime biotech protégé, BioNTech.
The German regulator, the PEI, had just agreed to let BioNTech proceed with a “first in human” phase I trial despite the fact that the company had not yet completed the preclinical toxicology study that was supposed to determine whether it was even safe to do so. Talk about cutting corners!
But do we hear about these developments in the contemporaneous RKI minutes of April 15, 2020? Curiously enough, we don’t — even though the RKI surely knew about them.
Instead in the leaked minutes we hear that Pfizer and the EMA were considering skipping Phase III trials. Pfizer? Phase III? Pfizer was not even practically involved in the authorization process at this stage. And how could either company have any clue that BioNTech’s candidate would even reach phase III trials? BioNTech had only registered its PEI-approved Phase I trial with the EMA the day before!
For details and discussion, see my new article at PANDA here. Originally published at the Daily Sceptic here. Also on the PANDA Substack, PANDA Uncut, where you can join the discussion here.
deflection, deceit, corruption: exposure the first step in accountability. as decribed in an earlier article in the Daily Sceptic, in the UK and US the initial public health policies that were in place between jan-march 2020 were replaced by a world-wide biodefence response, led by the National Security Council and FEMA/Department of Homeland Security, while in addition to military and intelligence agencies, "....the biodefence cartel that ran the Covid response encompassed global pharmaceutical companies enmeshed in public-private partnerships with governments to create and disseminate “countermeasures”, and global NGOs..." - https://dailysceptic.org/2024/07/07/it-was-biodefence-not-public-health-u-k-edition/
perhaps the same took place in Germany (the Institute's minutes of April 15) which suddenly mention that Pfizer and the EMA "were considering skipping Phase III trials": military take-over?